Menu
Search

Which Way Forward For Uk And China Higher Education Partnership?

As organizations that share a global perspective and provide students with an excellent international education, Richmond and CEG have much in common. Richmond was founded in 1972 by the late Sir Cyril Taylor to promote international student experience. As the only university in the UK to award both British and US degrees, Richmond has always been internationally oriented, with students from more than 60 countries enrolled at Richmond and Kensington Universities. [Sources: 1]

Another aspect of internationalization is to encourage Indian institutions to establish themselves on campus through strategic partnerships with local institutions. Partnerships between international higher education institutions offer boundless opportunities to establish an often-repeated research culture at the top of the rankings. As India benefits from a liberalised economy and an open economy, the global higher education sector will benefit from strong international partnerships. India offers a wide range of opportunities for international higher education institutions and the global student population. [Sources: 0]

Richmond American International University in London has entered into a strategic partnership with China Education Group Holdings Limited (CEG) to secure the long-term future of the university. The partnership with CEG will allow the university to broaden its international vision and make UK and US universities more accessible to students around the world. Richmond students will benefit from access to CEGs international portfolio at universities, including global learning, knowledge sharing, internship and exchange programs, and greater reach in international marketing and recruitment. [Sources: 1]

International cooperation in education, combining local learning with the torch of globalisation, will endure and progress as the post-COVID-19 generation embarks on their university journey. This was one of the key findings of Xian Jiaotong, Executive President of Liverpool University, and Professor Youmin Xi (pictured), who delivered the keynote speech at the world’s largest open conference for international education leaders this week. [Sources: 4]

Tony Blair promised to attract a further 100,000 foreign students to study in Britain by 2011, and past experience suggests that goal seems achievable. He has also promised to encourage more partnerships between universities and colleges across the UK, starting with the UK-India Education and Research Initiative (UKIERI). [Sources: 2]

We highlight various aspects of the discourse around cooperation and the different modalities of higher education partnership between China and Africa. We also comment on the specifics of China’s engagement with African universities through the Confucius Institutes and the 20 / 20 Initiative. However, these comments are inherently suggestive and provisional. We look forward to a more comprehensive analysis of Chinese development aid practices when full details of the Chinese and African sides of the initiative are available in the course of 2014. [Sources: 5]

But the Confucius Institute’s framework is far from the only mechanism in a series of competition programs that China is pursuing to support the further internationalization of its own higher education. Rather, it acts as an agent of the multidimensional internationalization of Chinese universities. [Sources: 5]

When he launched the first phase of his initiative in 1999, he promised to attract 50,000 more students and 25,000 further education students from non-EU countries. In fact, that figure was undercut to 43,000, but the figure was undercut by a modest 1,700. In April 2006, he stressed that internationalising education was not just about getting students to choose UK universities and colleges, but also about building sustainable partnerships between countries. [Sources: 2]

The roundtable, organized by the Times Higher Education Association (JISC), the UK’s body for digital technologies and resources in higher education, asked experts to consider the future of research collaboration against the backdrop of Western populism and changing global power structures. Professor Peter Mathieson, President and Vice-Chancellor of the University of Hong Kong, argued that the UK and Europe are becoming less and less relevant to both universities, and that both face existential challenges in terms of their dominance in research and teaching. For Professor Shearer West, vice-chancellor-designate at Nottingham University, the rise of an anti-expert culture in the Anglo-American world is the most worrying aspect of populism in the West. [Sources: 6]

Higher education institutions involve students, teachers, administrators, policymakers, workers, businessmen and marketers, and people with different social roles, demographics and socio-economic backgrounds. It is only natural that their interests run counter to what they see as the purpose of higher education. [Sources: 7]

It is worth pointing out that India’s higher education challenges are not only about equity and access, but also about quality and excellence, the relevance of governance and funding, promoting diversity, and enhancing capacity. Student mobility and global exchange are nothing new in India. [Sources: 0]

Kozol is crucial for the purpose of market-led education, because it uses business and commerce as key actors in shaping the purpose, content and curriculum of education. At the same time, students, parents, and teachers are indispensable to displace the type of symbolic participants. [Sources: 7]

The American tradition of student development goes back to the tradition of the liberal arts, whose main goal is to build a free person who can be an active member of civil society. It considers the provision of interdisciplinary training in the social sciences as they aim to prepare students for the challenges they face as professionals and members of society. [Sources: 7]

Both China and India and Brazil have chosen not to participate in Busan, based on the idea of global partnerships for effective development cooperation. This undoubtedly partly reflects China’s reluctance to be part of the donors “club. [Sources: 5]

Most forward-looking programs have been designed or established abroad. The closures include 62 of the 245 Chinese TNES programmes initiated by UK providers and 44 of the 149 programmes set up in partnership with Australian providers. Of the two countries, the US has launched 238 programs so far, and American institutions account for a significant share of higher education partnerships with Chinese and foreign providers. [Sources: 3]

The global market for higher education is growing rapidly. It is estimated that there are more than 110 million enrolments worldwide. As governments, nonprofits, and for-profit providers struggle to meet this surge in demand, British institutions must maintain their market share. [Sources: 2]

Another indication of this is the fact that foreign providers can expect additional oversight and a stricter approval process for new TNE initiatives in China. This suggests a more restrictive environment for the popular Joint 2 + 2 program, which allows Chinese students to start studying at home and then complete their studies abroad in order to obtain foreign degrees. [Sources: 3]

During the recovery phase of COVID-19, the research of the International Sciences Council has outlined a sustainable way forward. The results of this research were published in a synthesis report with eight key recommendations and four thematic reports on the policy decisions needed to achieve a strong and sustainable long-term future in January 2021. [Sources: 8]

 

 

Sources:

[0]: https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20160903061847638

[1]: https://www.richmond.ac.uk/new-partnership-announced-to-secure-richmonds-future/

[2]: https://www.theguardian.com/news/2006/dec/05/guardianextra3.guardianspecial66

[3]: https://monitor.icef.com/2018/07/china-announces-closure-200-tne-programmes/

[4]: https://www.xjtlu.edu.cn/en/news/2020/06/xjtlu-leader-considers-the-future-of-international-education-at-global-conference

[5]: https://journals.openedition.org/poldev/1788

[6]: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/hub/jisc-membership-organisation-providing-digital-solutions-uk-education-and-research/p/forging

[7]: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-017-0001-8

[8]: https://www.iau-aiu.net/COVID-19-Higher-Education-challenges-and-responses

 

What will China’s Development Policy be after Covid-19?

The many different trade and aid policies being pursued by China globally have been heavily criticised but can developing countries become more independent or will China’s policy reform?

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit,

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adi pisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incidi dunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit,

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adi pisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incidi dunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit,

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adi pisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incidi dunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.